MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4309323716 · doi:10.1177/14759217221134050

Cubic spline interpolation-based refined composite multiscale dispersion entropy and its application to bearing fault identification

2022· article· en· W4309323716 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueStructural Health Monitoring · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMachine Fault Diagnosis Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersFoundation for Innovative Research Groups of Hubei Province of ChinaChina Postdoctoral Science FoundationNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsSample entropyAlgorithmEntropy (arrow of time)Interpolation (computer graphics)Nonlinear systemComputer scienceSpline interpolationMathematicsPattern recognition (psychology)Artificial intelligenceComputer visionPhysicsBilinear interpolation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As a powerful tool, dispersion entropy (DE) has good capability to measure the irregularity and complexity of nonlinear systems, so it is extensively utilized in the field of structural health monitoring. However, traditional multiscale dispersion entropy (MDE) will suffer from down-sampling as the scale factor increases, which compresses some intrinsic feature information, so that the representation ability of MDE for nonlinear system is significantly restrained. Aiming at this problem, a new method called cubic spline interpolation-based refined composite multiscale dispersion entropy (CSIRCMDE) is proposed. In this frame, the coarse-graining series are regarded as knots to calculate the interpolative points in different sub-sections. Then, the obtained coarse-graining samples and interpolative samples are used to construct interpolation series to capture the potential vibration characteristics and constrain the down-sampling phenomenon. Finally, the first coarse-graining point is gradually shifted back to make multiple groups of interpolation series, and the entropy values are rectified by calculating mean pattern probabilities at the same scale. Through these steps, CSIRCMDE can grasp sufficient feature information to reduce entropy errors and overcome the dependence on sample size compared with traditional algorithms, which is demonstrated by simulation and noise signals. Furthermore, two types of bearing damage experiments prove that CSIRCMDE has good capability to characterize the bearing states, therefore, based on the proposed algorithm, the classification model that can fully identify different bearing faults is established.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.650
Threshold uncertainty score0.821

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it