New evidence about the nature of plasma filaments in plasma accelerators of type plasma-focus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In this work, new evidence and information about both the origin and evolution of filamentary structures observed in the current sheath of a small plasma focus (PF) discharge are reported. The experiments were carried out in a small generator of low energy (multipurpose generator) at the PF configuration, under different operating conditions. These include different anode and insulator geometries, without return bars and in a high-performance regime of the generator at high pressures ( > 10 mbar). The evolution of the plasma structures is characterized by means of refractive optical techniques. The electrical behavior of the discharge, as well as its performance, are monitored with conventional electrical diagnostics and neutron and x-ray detectors, respectively. Plasma filaments of the same species are present in all tested configurations, however, in experiments with larger effective anode length (and smaller anode radii), the plasma region containing the filaments moves away from the anode surface and remains confined in a region of the plasma sheath, such as a toroidal plasma belt, without reaching the top of the anode nor participating in the radial compression phase. According to images of the plasma sheath in its early phase, the filaments originate and evolve from a precursor annular plasma formed in the lower part of the anode next to the insulator, during the process of electrical breakdown. The local character that these dense-filamentary structures acquire in the evolution of the plasma sheath would discard the current-filament hypothesis. On the other hand, experiments performed in deuterium gas with anodes of larger effective lengths and without filaments in the radial compression phase allowed the production of neutrons and x-rays at a high performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".