MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4309327092 · doi:10.1093/tas/txac151

Improving beef calf health: frequency of disease syndromes, uptake of management practices following calving, and potential for antimicrobial use reduction in western Canadian herds

2022· article· en· W4309327092 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueTranslational Animal Science · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldVeterinary
TopicAnimal health and immunology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryAlberta HealthUniversity of Saskatchewan
FundersBeef Cattle Research CouncilMinistry of Agriculture - Saskatchewan
KeywordsWeaningHerdIce calvingMedicineBovine respiratory diseaseNavelAntimicrobialAnimal scienceDiarrheaBeef cattleVeterinary medicinePregnancyInternal medicineBiologyLactationSurgeryImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Bovine respiratory disease (BRD), calf diarrhea (CD), and navel infections are the most commonly reported diseases of western Canadian beef calves. The objectives of this study were to estimate the frequency of treatment for these diseases for specific age cohorts and identify potential opportunities for reducing antimicrobial use. Producers representing 89 western Canadian cow-calf herds completed a survey describing calfhood diseases and management. The most common reason for calf treatment before weaning was BRD (4.9%), and BRD treatment was described in 51% of reporting herds before 2 months of age. Calf diarrhea (2.9%) and navel infection (2.0%) were the second and third most common reasons for treatment. Most calves were treated for CD between 6 days and 1 month of age. Almost one in five herds reported routinely administering antimicrobials at birth. Calving heifers and cows together were all associated with an increased treatment risk for BRD in calves from birth to 2 months (OR 3.55, 95%CI 2.13–5.94, P < 0.0001), CD from 1 month to weaning (OR 3.94, 95%CI 1.29–12.0, P = 0.02), and navel infection (OR 4.55, 95%CI 1.78–11.6, P = 0.002). Failure to sort cow-calf pairs out of the calving area was also associated with an increased treatment risk for BRD from 4 months to weaning (OR 4.89, 95%CI 1.96–12.2, P = 0.0006) and CD from 24 h to 5 days (OR 2.82, 95%CI 1.03–7.75, P = 0.04), and not using the Sandhills system was associated with an increased treatment risk for navel infection (OR 4.55, 95%CI 1.78–11.6, P = 0.002). Other potentially modifiable factors associated with an increased risk of BRD in calves from birth to 2 months were winter feeding and calving in one area (P < 0.0001), heifers calving in a higher density area (P = 0.01), and an increasing number of times cow-calf pairs were gathered before turn out to summer pasture (P = 0.0005). The purchase of any cows during the calving or prebreeding period was associated with an increased risk of BRD from birth to 2 months (P < 0.0001) and from 2 to 4 months (P < 0.0001). A history of respiratory bacterin vaccines administered to the dams was associated with a decreased risk of BRD in calves from 4 months to weaning (P = 0.01). Cows calving in a higher density area was associated with an increased risk of CD from 1 month to weaning (P = 0.02). These practices present opportunities for investigation of approaches to disease management that could support the judicious use of antimicrobials.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.641
Threshold uncertainty score0.906

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it