MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4309345270 · doi:10.1109/smc53654.2022.9945231

Improving Time Series Generation of GANs through Soft Dynamic Time Warping Loss

2022· article· en· W4309345270 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venue2022 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicTime Series Analysis and Forecasting
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDynamic time warpingComputer scienceSeries (stratigraphy)Metric (unit)Image warpingTime seriesSequence (biology)Function (biology)AlgorithmGenerative grammarReal-time computingArtificial intelligenceMachine learning

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the rising popularity of Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs) in generating synthetic data, time series are no exception to this trend. In this work, we propose two novel loss functions sDTW-p and sDTW-m based on SoftDynamic Time Warping that can be used to improve the generated time series without modifications to the existing architecture. We also present the first evaluation of the generated samples across different sequence length. Lastly, we show empirically that the result of leveraging our loss function can lead to a 9% improvement according to our metric.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.929
Threshold uncertainty score0.902

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it