Improving imbalanced dataset classification using Conditional Classifier-Generator (cCGen)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Thermal Comfort Data is critical to generate machine learning models for efficient heating and cooling systems. However, thermal comfort datasets are often highly imbalanced due to subjective user feedback, thus making it challenging to accurately predict both majority and minority classes. This demands the use of data synthesis techniques prior to training classification models to balance the datasets. Commonly used techniques like Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE) or Adaptive Synthetic Sampling Method (ADASYN) often compromise testing accuracy and more sophisticated techniques like Conditional Wasserstein Generative Adversarial Network with gradient penalty (cWGAN-GP) are significantly expensive to train. In this paper we propose a novel data augmentation algorithm called Conditional Classifier-Generator (cCGen) to address these two issues. We evaluated the performance of cCGen with real thermal comfort data against SMOTE, ADASYN and cWGAN-GP at different imbalance ratios. Our experiments reveal that our approach can produce better F1 scores than other sampling methods while being more than 10 times faster than cWGAN-GP and not compromising test accuracy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".