Terahertz Metasurface-Based Refractive Index Sensor for Amino Acid Detection: A Numerical Approach
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A graphene disk metasurface-inspired refractive index sensor (RIS) with a subwavelength structure is numerically investigated to enhance the functionality of flexible metasurface in the biosensor sector. The main aim behind the sensor development is to detect amino acids with high sensitivity. The results in form of transmittance and the electric field intensity are carried out to verify the sensor’s performance. The optimal design of the proposed sensor is also obtained by varying several structural parameters such as glass-based substrate thickness, the inner radius of the graphene disk metasurface, and the angle of incidence. The proposed sensor is also wide-angle insensitive for the angle of incidence ranging from 0° to 60°. Furthermore, the sensor’s attributes are analyzed based on numerous parameters with an achieved maximum sensitivity of 333.33 GHz/RIU, Figure of Merit (FOM) of 3.11 RIU <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">−1</sup> , and Q-factor of 7.3 are achieved. As a result, these insights offered an enhanced direction for designing metasurface biosensors with a high Q-factor and FOM with high sensitivity for the detection of amino acids.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it