MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4309378127 · doi:10.1139/tcsme-2021-0192

Analysis on parametric vibration of hydraulic opposing cylinders controlled by a servo valve considering pressure pulsation

2022· article· en· W4309378127 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Xiaoming Yuan, Weiqi Wang, Xuan Zhu, Bing Du, Lijie Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical Engineering · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydraulic and Pneumatic Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectrohydraulic servo valveControl theory (sociology)Nonlinear systemNatural frequencyResonance (particle physics)VibrationParametric oscillatorParametric statisticsMechanicsModalFrequency responseStiffnessServomechanismPhysicsEngineeringAcousticsComputer scienceMathematicsStructural engineeringMaterials scienceControl engineeringMechanical engineeringOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

During the working process of the system of hydraulic opposing cylinders controlled by a servo valve, the fluid equivalent stiffness changes dynamically due to the pressure pulsation of the pump source. Therefore, the transmission system has obvious nonlinear effects, and its dynamic performance is difficult to improve further. Thus, a nonlinear dynamic model of the system of hydraulic opposing cylinders controlled by a servo valve was established. By using the multiscale method, the steady-state approximate solutions of the primary resonance and the combination resonance of the system were derived to reveal their characteristic laws. The results showed that the dominant frequency of the system's primary resonance is the frequency of the external excitation source, and the dominant frequency of the system's combination resonance is the sum of the natural frequency of each order and the fluctuation frequency of the fluid equivalent stiffness. The amplitude of the combination resonance was smaller than that of the primary resonance. The maximum error between the theoretical natural frequency and the experimental modal frequency was 3.77%, which verified the correctness of the system's nonlinear dynamic model. The research can provide a theoretical reference for the dynamics optimization design of the hydraulic transmission system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.950
Threshold uncertainty score0.627

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.197
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTransactions of the Canadian Society for Mechanical EngineeringSame topicHydraulic and Pneumatic SystemsFrench-language works237,207