MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4309383133 · doi:10.1101/2022.11.14.516459

MOT: a Multi-Omics Transformer for multiclass classification tumour types predictions

2022· preprint· en· W4309383133 on OpenAlexafffund
Mazid Abiodoun Osseni, Prudencio Tossou, François Laviolette, Jacques Corbeil

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Canadian institutionsDiscovery CentreUniversité Laval
FundersCompute Canada
KeywordsOmicsEpigenomicsComputer scienceComputational biologyProteomicsMachine learningBiologyBioinformaticsArtificial intelligenceDNA methylationGeneGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Motivation Breakthroughs in high-throughput technologies and machine learning methods have enabled the shift towards multi-omics modelling as the preferred means to understand the mechanisms underlying biological processes. Machine learning enables and improves complex disease prognosis in clinical settings. However, most multi-omic studies primarily use transcriptomics and epigenomics due to their over-representation in databases and their early technical maturity compared to others omics. For complex phenotypes and mechanisms, not leveraging all the omics despite their varying degree of availability can lead to a failure to understand the underlying biological mechanisms and leads to less robust classifications and predictions. Results We proposed MOT (Multi-Omic Transformer), a deep learning based model using the transformer architecture, that discriminates complex phenotypes (herein cancer types) based on five omics data types: transcriptomics (mRNA and miRNA), epigenomics (DNA methylation), copy number variations (CNVs), and proteomics. This model achieves an F1-score of 98.37% among 33 tumour types on a test set without missing omics views and an F1-score of 96.74% on a test set with missing omics views. It also identifies the required omic type for the best prediction for each phenotype and therefore could guide clinical decisionmaking when acquiring data to confirm a diagnostic. The newly introduced model can integrate and analyze five or more omics data types even with missing omics views and can also identify the essential omics data for the tumour multiclass classification tasks. It confirms the importance of each omic view. Combined, omics views allow a better differentiation rate between most cancer diseases. Our study emphasized the importance of multi-omic data to obtain a better multiclass cancer classification. Availability and implementation MOT source code is available at https://github.com/dizam92/multiomic_predictions .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.248
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicCancer Genomics and DiagnosticsFrench-language works237,207