Bibliographic record
Abstract
performance, 26 and transience, 19 n.72 Alexander the Great, 42-5, 54, 58 n.62, 158 Alexis, 68-71 allusion and echo, 232, 233 n.19, 236-8 and epigram, 59-67, 73, 153-6 and etymology, 156, 192, 231 and excerpt, 183-226 and exemplum, 211 and hapax legomenon, 13 n.44, 130, 137, 153, 154 and interpolation, 219-21 and intertexual marker, 201 n.59 and locus communis, 210, 216 and lyric appropriation of Homeric material, 112-13 and oppositio in imitando, 130 and quotationality, 185 and Vergil, 192 as pluckable textual object, 219 as quotation, 13, 113 integrative, 210 reflective, 210 through editing, 154 Amyntas, pseudo-Bematist, 53-5 Anacreon, 14, 165, 183 Anacreontea, 14, 16, 172, 185 Anchiale, 42-5, 49, 54, 73 anthology, 186-7, 207-8, 209, 212-14, 221 n.133 Antiphilus, epigrammatist, 161 n.65 Antonia Minor, 161 Apollo, 112 Palatine temple of, 165 Apollonides, epigrammatist, 150-5 archaeology (of literary predecessors) and carpe diem, 39 and Sardanapallus, 52 in Hellenistic literature, 15 archaism, 34, 119-25, 135 and wine, 103-7 Archestratus of Gela, 23-4 and Epicurus, 67 Archilochus, 12, 147-8 archive, 105 Argentarius, Marcus, epigrammatist, 155-6 argumentum a fortiori, 13, 61 Aristippus of Cyrene, 21-2, 56 n.56 Aristobulus of Cassandria, 42-5, 51 Aristophanes of Byzantium, 69 Aristotle, 41, 54 n.54, 55-6, 118 Arrian, 42-5, 51-2 Asclepiades of Samos, 16, 17, 56, 155-6, 166 as lyric poet, 15 Ashurbanipal, 44 n.17 Athenaeus, 11, 41, 59-61, 68-9, 143, 153, 189, 212-14 Athens, 70 Auden, W.H., 112 n.14 Augustus, 73, 104, 161 and banquet, 102 and calendar, 84 n.23, 88, 90 and Horace, 101-2 and wine storage, 90-1 callida iunctura, 119-25, 131-3, 202 Callimachus, 65, 69, 136-8, 154, 165 Callisthenes of Olynthus, 42 Carmina Burana, 224 carpe diem and cliché, 224-6 and Epicurus, 20-1 and luxury, 142 and music, 1-6 and sex, 172-6, 218-19 expression of, 36-7, 131-3, 199, 209 in "Eastern" culture, 39 in first centuries bc and ad, 141-2 survey of, 8-25 Cassius, Gaius Cassius Longinus, 80 n.14, 104
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.600 | 0.605 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".