MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4309438670 · doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2022.11.002

International Validation of the EORTC QLQ-ANL27, a Field Study to Test the Anal Cancer-Specific Health-Related Quality-of-Life Questionnaire

2022· article· en· W4309438670 on OpenAlex
Samantha C. Sodergren, Colin D. Johnson, Alexandra Gilbert, Anne‐Sophie Darlington, Kim Cocks, Marianne G. Guren, Eleonor Rivin del Campo, Christine Brannan, Peter Christensen, William Chu, Hans T. Chung, Kristopher Dennis, Isacco Desideri, Duncan C. Gilbert, R. Glynne‐Jones, Michael Jefford, Mia Johansson, Anders Johnsson, Therese Juul, Dimitrios Kardamakis, Julia Lai‐Kwon, Vicky McFarlane, Isalia M.C. Miguel, Karen Nugent, Femke P. Peters, Rachel P. Riechelmann, Nazım Serdar Turhal, C. Shun Wong, Vassilios Vassiliou

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicColorectal and Anal Carcinomas
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaOttawa HospitalHealth Sciences CentreSunnybrook Health Science Centre
FundersAcademy of Medical SciencesNational Institute for Health and Care ResearchCancer Research UK
KeywordsTest (biology)Quality of life (healthcare)CancerMedicineAnal cancerMedical physicsNursingInternal medicineBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.427

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.375
Teacher spread0.329 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it