Electronic documents are part of the digital heritage of modern society
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of the article is to provide a theoretical description of the main aspects of functioning of electronic documents as part of the digital heritage of modern Ukrainian society; to outline its place in the preservation of digital cultural heritage; to focus attention on the contribution of Ukrainika as a valuable resource of digital heritage. Moreover, the aim of the paper is to reveal the essence of the concept of "digital heritage" in the UNESCO "Charter on the Preservation of Digital Heritage", the Vancouver Declaration "Memory of the World in the Digital Age: Digitization and Preservation", "Recommendations on Ensuring Preservation and Access to Documentary Heritage", as well as to analyse the trends in the activities of the European Digital Library. The research methodology is based on the retrospective analysis that has been used to determine the goals, tasks of the design of the expected findings in the process of collecting and processing facts. The features of "digital heritage", "cultural heritage" concepts, description of the problem of documentary heritage preservation have been analysed. The textological method has been used to form the idea about the system of preserving the cultural heritage of the Ukrainian people; the generalisation method enabled revealing the general picture of the place of electronic documents as part of the digital heritage of the information sphere of society's life. The scientific novelty of the work consists in substantiating the inclusion of electronic documents in the information space with the help of modern technologies, which contributes to the digitalisation of cultural heritage, education and science of Ukraine. Conclusions. Electronic documents occupy an important place in the composition of digital and documentary heritage. The world community has a developed legal framework and experience in preserving digital documentary heritage. As a European state, Ukraine regularly participates in replenishing the world's digital documentary heritage by providing free access to it for users. Keywords: digital heritage, documentary heritage, cultural heritage, electronic document, digital resource, information space, library fund.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.010 | 0.007 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".