Clinical outcomes and cognitive impairments between progressive supranuclear palsy and multiple system atrophy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Both progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) and multiple system atrophy (MSA) belong to atypical parkinsonian syndromes. It is important to differentiate these diseases accurately. We compared clinical outcomes and cognitive impairments between PSP and MSA. METHODS: Eighty-five MSA parkinsonism type (MSA-P) patients and 76 PSP patients participated in this research. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and the mini-mental state examination (MMSE) evaluated cognitive function. RESULTS: MSA-P patients had a significantly higher incidence of dyskinesia, fall, urinary symptoms, and constipation, whereas patients with PSP had a higher incidence of tremor and salivation. MSA-P patients had higher MMSE and MoCA scores than PSP patients. The MMSE score showed a diagnostic cut-off score of 24.5 in PSP versus MSA-P. The MoCA score showed a diagnostic cut-off score of 20.5 in PSP versus MSA-P. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, patients with PSP had differences in the clinical outcomes and cognitive impairments compared with MSA-P patients. PSP patients had more severe cognitive deficits. The score of MMSE and MoCA could be used in distinguishing MSA-P from PSP.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".