A Real-World, Population-Based Study for the Incidence and Outcomes of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms of Nondigestive, Nonpulmonary Primary
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to assess incidence and outcomes of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) arising from primary sites other than digestive organs, lung, or thymic gland. METHODS: Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (1975-2016) was accessed, and cases of NENs arising from primary sites other than digestive organs, lung, or thymic gland were reviewed. Overall and cancer-specific survival outcomes for NENs arising from different organs compared with small intestinal NENs were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 4405 patients were included in the study. Compared with small intestinal NENs, some NENs arising from uncommon sites in the current study have worse cancer-specific survival (hazard ratio [HR] for genitourinary vs small intestinal NENs, 1.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.44-2.25; HR for gynecological vs small intestinal NENs, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.52-2.33). When the analysis was limited for patients with distant stage only, small intestinal NENs have better outcomes compared with genitourinary and gynecological NENs (HR for genitourinary NENs with distant stage vs small intestinal NENs with distant stage, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.01-1.88; HR for gynecological NENs with distant stage vs small intestinal NENs with distant stage, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.54-2.66). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with small intestinal NENs, NENs arising from uncommon sites (such as genitourinary, gynecological) have worse survival outcomes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".