MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4309524971 · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-2278169/v1

Effect of lignin and released acid on the gelation and aerogel fabrication of whole biomass in the lithium bromide molten salt hydrate system

2022· preprint· en· W4309524971 on OpenAlexaff
Xu Guo, Xinyu Cao, Tianyuan Xiao, Minjie Hou, Changgeng Li, Xueru Sheng, Yanzhu Guo, Yanning Sun, Pedram Fatehi, Haiqiang Shi

Bibliographic record

VenueResearch Square · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAerogels and thermal insulation
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Liaoning ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsAerogelLigninBiomass (ecology)Alkali metalMaterials scienceRaw materialChemical engineeringHydrateLithium (medication)ChemistryOrganic chemistryNanotechnologyAgronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Biomass-based aerogels have received attention these days due to their environmentally friendly and easily degradable nature. However, the aerogel production is challenged by the generation of acid in aerogel manufacturing. This work aims at understanding how acid originating from biomass would impact aerogel production. In this study, alkali pre-extraction (APE) was carried out to demonstrate how the acidic substances released from poplar in a green inorganic molten salt hydrate solvent (LiBr·3H2O) would impact the properties of biomass-based aerogels. To understand the impact of lignin on aerogel production, the aerogel production was carried out on lignin-free biomass. The results confirmed that alkali pretreatment of biomass could be an effective method to accelerate the production of biomass-based aerogels. The biomass and particle size primarily affected the properties and microstructure of aerogels. Also, lignin has a substantial adverse effect on such aerogel production. Therefore, selecting suitable alkali treatment conditions, biomass content and particle size have crucial effects on the preparation of lignin-containing aerogels and lignin-free aerogels.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.455

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.299 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueResearch SquareSame topicAerogels and thermal insulationFrench-language works237,207