MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4309561675 · doi:10.1145/3570732

Integrating Robot Manufacturer Perspectives into Legible Factory Robot Light Communications

2022· article· en· W4309561675 on OpenAlex
Alexandra Bacula, Jason Mercer, Jaden Berger, Julie A. Adams, Heather Knight

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicSocial Robot Interaction and HRI
Canadian institutionsGeneral Motors (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRobotRoboticsArtificial intelligenceFactory (object-oriented programming)EngineeringComputer scienceHuman–computer interaction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In a world with increasing numbers of robots operating in everyday human spaces, the employees at this robotics company are pioneers, with intelligent point-to-point path planning and autonomous transport operations in 150+ factory and warehouse locations in North America. At the time of research, this robotics company consisted of 250 employees. Unlike other industry models, their robots are designed to operate with people in mixed human-machine spaces, yet no HRI style evaluations had previously been run with their robots. As early observers of how factory workers and transport robot interact, across varied job roles ranging from technology design to customer relations, this work sought to leverage employee knowledge and experiences to identify opportunities for improving the communication capabilities of the robots, resulting in the addition of several robot state communications to their initial software set leveraging both employee- and social robotics literature- sourced ideas for communicating with lights. To achieve this a social robotics researcher spent a summer onsite at the robotics company, getting to know their software stack and culture. Her research activities included: (1) a company-wide survey relative to the robot’s light, sound, and motion communications was sent out and analyzed, (2) the development of three new light sets (car-like, sweeping, heartbeat) and five overall states (blocked, at goal, turning, idle), and (3) a user study evaluating the developed light sets relative to the current robot default light patterns, all significantly improving the overall legibility of the targeted robot state communications: at goal, blocked, turning, and idle. Our initial findings advance knowledge in which style of light patterns is best for different communication states, showing that eye-catching lights are best for high urgency states, such as blocked, and subtle lights are best for low urgency states, such as idle. Finally, the latest software release for this robot has deployed a subset of these light patterns to all of their currently operating client sites, i.e., anyone who updates their robots to the latest release will benefit from these research results. This deployment sets the ground for future researchers exploring how end-users at different sites have responded to the new, more communicative light patterns.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.893
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0400.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.129
GPT teacher head0.437
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it