MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4309561806 · doi:10.1155/2022/1136386

[Retracted] Correlation Analysis of Inflammatory Markers CRP and IL‐6 and Postoperative Delirium (POD) in Elderly Patients: A Meta‐Analysis of Observational Studies

2022· review· en· W4309561806 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Xiaoling Huang, Lanyang Li, Qiuping Feng

Post-publication record

NatureRetraction
ReasonConcerns/Issues about Data;Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions;Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions;Concerns/Issues about Peer Review;Investigation by Journal/Publisher;Investigation by Third Party;Computer-Aided Content or Computer-Generated Content;Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions;
Date7/12/2023 0:00
Flagged by OpenAlex?Yes

Source: Retraction Watch, joined by DOI. OpenAlex records retraction as is_retracted, a boolean over a state space with at least four values, so it cannot express an expression of concern, a correction or a reinstatement; it reports them as false, which reads as “fine”.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Environmental and Public Health · 2022
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicinePoint of deliveryMeta-analysisInternal medicineCochrane LibraryCohort studyProspective cohort studyDeliriumPopulationGastroenterologyIntensive care medicineBiologyEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background. Postoperative delirium (POD) is very common in the elderly surgical population, and its occurrence is associated with multiple factors such as preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative factors, and the increase of serum inflammatory markers such as C‐reactive protein (CRP) and interleukin‐6 (IL‐6) is considered to be associated with the occurrence of POD, but the results of multiple studies are inconsistent. In this study, we investigated the correlation between inflammatory markers CRP and IL‐6 and POD in elderly patients by literature search and meta‐analysis. Methods. We searched PubMed, Web of Science, the Cochrane library, Embase, Ovid, and Springer Link for cohort studies or case‐control studies that investigated the factors involved in the occurrence of POD, used the Newcastle‐Ottawa Scale (NOS) to assess the quality of the selected literature, and combined the differences in serum CRP and IL‐6 levels between POD and non‐POD patients after surgery to evaluate the predictive value of CRP and IL‐6 for the occurrence of POD. Results. This research comprised 16 papers for quantitative analysis, with a total of 2967 patients, 758 with POD and 2209 with non‐POD. There were 16 cohort studies (100%) and 0 case‐control studies (0%) across all the collected literatures; there were 15 prospective cohort studies and 1 retrospective cohort research. A meta‐analysis revealed a statistically significant difference in serum IL‐6 levels between POD patients after surgery and non‐POD patients [MD = 115.68, 95% CI (25.70, 206.66), Z = 2.52, P = 0.012], as well as a statistically significant difference in serum CRP levels [MD = 27.67, 95% CI (12.77, 42.58), Z = 3.64, P = 0.0003]. Discussion. Early after surgery, serum IL‐6 and CRP levels were considerably higher in POD patients than in non‐POD patients, indicating that early serum inflammatory variables are likely to be predictors of POD. After surgery, the levels of the aforementioned inflammatory factors should be actively monitored to forecast the emergence of delirium, and active treatment should be used to limit the creation and release of the aforementioned inflammatory factors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.017
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.063
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesResearch integrity
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.998
Threshold uncertainty score0.088

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0170.063
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0080.027
Bibliometrics0.0060.008
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0030.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.121
GPT teacher head0.357
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Environmental and Public HealthSame topicIntensive Care Unit Cognitive DisordersFrench-language works237,207