Balsam Fir (Abies balsamea (L.) Mill.) Wood Quality after Defoliation by Spruce Budworm (Choristoneura fumiferana Clem.) in the Boreal Forest of Quebec, Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Eastern spruce budworm (Choristoneura fumiferana Clem.) is considered the most important disturbing insect in coniferous stands in eastern North America. During an outbreak, spruce budworm can cause severe defoliation in balsam fir (Abies balsamea (L.) Mill.), which can affect wood properties such as moisture content and mechanical properties. This project aimed to assess the influence of the duration of spruce budworm defoliation on the wood quality of mature balsam fir trees. To do this, we studied sapwood proportion, decay, moisture content, mechanical properties and tracheid dimensions in stands that had suffered three, four or five years of defoliation. We also compared living and dead balsam firs and evaluated the change in wood properties with time. Our results showed that dead balsam firs suffered from a loss of wood quality rapidly after their death, particularly in terms of moisture content and decay in the sapwood. Sapwood proportion was similar between living and dead trees, but the sapwood of dead trees contained more decay and had a lower moisture content than living trees. Mechanical properties and tracheid dimensions were 10% and 4% lower in dead trees than in living trees. We did not observe any major differences in wood properties between the three durations of defoliation, suggesting that wood degradation occurs before that. The study did not make it possible to determine the optimal duration of defoliation to harvest the stands.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".