MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4309607991 · doi:10.3390/app122211666

Numerical Investigation of a Novel Bottom-Up Assisted Pressure Drive Process in Oil Sands Reservoirs with Shale Barriers

2022· article· en· W4309607991 on OpenAlexaff
Min Yang, Sen Wang, Qihong Feng, Yanguang Yuan

Bibliographic record

VenueApplied Sciences · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
Canadian institutionsBitCan (Canada)
FundersChina University of Petroleum, BeijingChina Postdoctoral Science Foundation
KeywordsPetroleum engineeringSteam-assisted gravity drainageOil shaleInjectorOil sandsShale oil extractionShale oilUnconventional oilSteam injectionBottom waterAsphaltTight oilEnvironmental scienceGeologyEngineeringWaste managementMaterials scienceMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Steam-assisted gravity drainage (SAGD) is widely applied to recover bitumen and heavy oil resources. Reservoir heterogeneity, especially the presence of shale barriers, continues to challenge the performance of SAGD. A novel enhanced oil recovery process, bottom-up assisted pressure drive, is proposed to improve the oil production in the reservoirs with shale barriers. In this work, numerical simulation is applied to investigate the feasibility of a bottom-up assisted pressure drive process. A reservoir model with typical oil sand reservoir properties is developed considering shale barriers. The performance of bottom-up assisted pressure drive and SAGD is compared under the same reservoir conditions, including steam chamber development, oil production rate, cumulative oil production, and the pressure difference between injector and production. The inherent mechanisms associated with the bottom-up assisted pressure drive are also well understood and confirmed. In the bottom-up assisted pressure drive, a flat steam chamber is developed from the bottom of the reservoir in the early stage of the process and grows upward with the injection of steam. The large volume of the steam chamber and the huge contact area between steam and bitumen contribute to a high oil production rate. The peak oil production rate in the bottom-up assisted pressure drive is approximately three times that in the SAGD process. The cumulative oil production in the bottom-up assisted pressure drive is 20% higher than that in the SAGD process. The effect of shale barriers on bottom-up assisted pressure drive is less, indicating one advantage of this novel process over SAGD in oil sands reservoirs with shale barriers. The pressure difference in the bottom-up assisted pressure drive is greater than that in the SAGD process. The pressure drive is another mechanism for improving oil production. The calculated net present value (NPV) in the bottom-up assisted pressure drive process is 27% higher than that in the SAGD process. This is mainly attributed to the high oil production rate in the early stage of the process and high cumulative oil production. The simulation study in this work provides technical support for the future field applications of this novel recovery process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.030

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueApplied SciencesSame topicEnhanced Oil Recovery TechniquesFrench-language works237,207