MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4309618898 · doi:10.1177/87552930221128607

Evaluating post‐earthquake functionality and surge capacity of hospital emergency departments using discrete event simulation

2022· article· en· W4309618898 on OpenAlexaffabout
Gerald Palomino Romani, Kristen Blowes, Carlos Molina Hutt

Bibliographic record

VenueEarthquake Spectra · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicDisaster Response and Management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBottleneckEarthquake casualty estimationEvent (particle physics)SeismologyMedical emergencyMedicineEngineeringEarthquake scenarioGeologySeismic hazardOperations management

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Past earthquakes have illustrated the impacts of reduced hospital functionality due to physical damage resulting in a health service deficit immediately after a major seismic event. In this article, a methodology was developed to quantify the deficit in health care anticipated due to a loss of functionality of a hospital emergency department (ED) and a surge in demand due to regional damage in an earthquake scenario. Earthquake‐induced patient arrivals were calculated using multi‐severity casualty estimation for the catchment area of the hospital. The surge in patients (demand) was then compared to the ability of the hospital to treat patients (capacity) based on anticipated functionality. Nonlinear response history analysis of the hospital building was performed using simplified structural models, and the structural and non‐structural component damage was estimated based on FEMA P‐58. Expected damage was linked to the post‐earthquake functionality of the ED service areas on each floor by incorporating the fault‐tree analysis method. Finally, discrete event simulation was used to evaluate the ED surge capacity, providing hospital performance metrics, such as wait times (WTs) and length of stay (LOS) for patients of ranging acuity. A case study of a hospital in the City of Vancouver subjected to an M w 9.0 Cascadia Subduction Zone scenario earthquake was presented. Emergency rooms (ERs) were identified as the ED bottleneck during the emergency response. The mean ER WT exceeded its limit of 2 h and reached up to 17 h in the most unfavorable simulation. Likewise, the mean LOS nearly doubled from 6.5 to 12 h, also exceeding the established target of 10 h. The deployment of field hospitals for less severe patients as an emergency plan to mitigate the ED overcrowding was also analyzed to demonstrate that the methodology can be used as a decision support tool to improve healthcare disaster planning.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.085

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.108
GPT teacher head0.427
Teacher spread0.319 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEarthquake SpectraSame topicDisaster Response and ManagementFrench-language works237,207