Density Staircases Are Disappearing in the Canada Basin of the Arctic Ocean
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In the Canada Basin of the Arctic Ocean, warm and salty Atlantic‐origin Water (AW) lies in the intermediate layer (250–800 m) below a colder and fresher surface layer. It results in a depth range where vertical thermohaline gradients are propitious to double‐diffusion. Indeed, thermohaline staircases are commonly observed and associated with double‐diffusive processes. Using observations from the Beaufort Gyre Exploration Project large database and Ice‐Tethered Profilers, we document the presence of density staircases in the 300–700 m depth range with a striking strong spatial and temporal coherence. However, since 2007, a progressive smoothing of these staircases has occurred, beginning from the western half of the basin. Quantifying this evolution, we find that a general pattern is a clear evolution over time from numerous thick steps (≃40 m) with sharp interfaces to fewer and thinner steps (≃30 m) with smoother interfaces. After 2014, marked density staircases have almost disappeared in most of the Canada Basin. The vanishing of staircases occurs over a few years and coincides with modifications of the large scale circulation and thermohaline large scale horizontal gradients. As the small scale thermohaline structures are thought to play an important role for the vertical and horizontal exchanges of heat within the Canada Basin, the disappearance of the steps may impact the heat distribution at depth, with potential consequences for the evolution of the sea ice cover.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".