MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Design and analysis of a hybrid power system for Francois, NL: Memorial University of Newfoundland and Labrador St. John's, Newfoundland, Canada

2022· article· en· W4309640336 on OpenAlexaffabout
Karankumar Patel, Dharmik Kiranbhai Kachhadiya, Dhruvkumar Rinkeshbhai Kapatel, M. Tariq Iqbal

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicHybrid Renewable Energy Systems
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiesel generatorRenewable energyPhotovoltaic systemStand-alone power systemAutomotive engineeringHybrid systemSizingEngineeringElectricityElectric power systemElectrical engineeringEnvironmental scienceDiesel fuelComputer scienceDistributed generationPower (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article presents a Hybrid Power System (HPS) for a remote location; the hybrid power system includes a solar PV system-Diesel Generator-Battery system for Francois, a remote community located on the southern coast of Newfoundland, Canada. This district has a significantly less population. Electricity demand is fulfilled by generating energy through fossil fuels, which is costly and threatens the climate. With the advancements in renewable energy technologies, it is more convenient to set up a hybrid system for remote locations to help decrease the energy distribution gap and provide the community with an efficient supply of electricity. The system sizing is carried out using the HOMER pro software. Longi solar panels, Volvo diesel generator, and Trojan SSIG Battery operated as Energy Storage System (ESS). The Net Present Cost (NPC) is $3599777, and the Cost of Energy (COE) is $0.2798 CAD, with more than 90% renewable penetration. The system dynamic modeling is created in MATLAB/Simulink. The findings show that the proposed model can accurately replicate the system's behavior in different scenarios:- standard operation settings, varying irradiance conditions, various load demand conditions, and different wind speed conditions. The system is supported by a battery and a diesel generator, and PV arrays supply the load with a fixed and steady voltage and frequency under all conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.882
Threshold uncertainty score0.235

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHybrid Renewable Energy SystemsFrench-language works237,207