Machine-Learning-Driven High-Entropy Alloy Catalyst Discovery to Circumvent the Scaling Relation for CO<sub>2</sub> Reduction Reaction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To achieve an equitable energy transition toward net-zero 2050 goals, the electrochemical reduction of CO 2 (CO 2 RR) to chemical feedstocks through utilizing both CO 2 and renewable energy is particularly attractive. However, the catalytic activity of CO 2 RR is limited by the scaling relation of the adsorption energies of intermediates. Circumventing the scaling relation is a potential strategy to achieve a breakthrough in catalytic activity. Herein, based on density functional theory (DFT) calculations, we designed a high-entropy alloy (HEA) system of FeCoNiCuMo with high catalytic activity for CO 2 RR. Machine learning models were developed by considering 1280 adsorption sites to predict the adsorption energies of COOH*, CO*, and CHO*. The scaling relation between the adsorption energies of COOH*, CO*, and CHO* is circumvented by the rotation of COOH* and CHO* on the designed HEA surface, resulting in the outstanding catalytic activity of CO 2 RR with the limiting potential of 0.29–0.51 V. This work not only accelerates the development of HEA catalysts but also provides an effective strategy to circumvent the scaling relation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".