MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4309650147 · doi:10.1101/2022.11.20.22282570

The interaction of polygenic risk for depression and age on white blood cell count

2022· preprint· en· W4309650147 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Earvin S. Tio, Daniel Felsky

Bibliographic record

VenuemedRxiv · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicTryptophan and brain disorders
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoCentre for Addiction and Mental Health
FundersMedical Research CouncilCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchKrembil Foundation
KeywordsDepression (economics)White blood cellPolygenic risk scoreMedicineLongitudinal studyEpidemiologyGenome-wide association studyBiobankInternal medicineDemographyBiologyBioinformaticsGeneticsPathologyGenotypeSingle-nucleotide polymorphismGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Polygenic risk for depression is associated with elevated white blood cell count (WBC), providing support for a pro-inflammatory causal mechanism of depression. However, the important roles of biological sex and age on depression and inflammation have not been accounted for in these analyses. Methods We calculated polygenic risk scores for depression (PRS dep ) in 362,074 individuals from the UK Biobank (aged 39-72, 53.7% female) and 22,965 individuals from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging (CLSA; aged 45-86, 50.3% female). We tested for main effects of PRS dep , sex, and non-linear age, as well as their interactions, on 25 blood-based measures (i.e., from complete blood counts, metabolic and lipid panels, and inflammatory tests). Associations significant in both cohorts were carried forward for further sex-stratified and mediation modelling. Results PRS dep was significantly associated with 13 biomarkers in the UK Biobank, with five replicating in the CLSA (WBC, granulocyte, and lymphocyte counts, and C-reactive protein and triglyceride levels), with standardized effect sizes ranging from β=0.006 (C-reactive protein, p =7.50×10 −4 ) to β=0.03 (WBC, p =1.71×10 −4 ). Sex-specific effects of PRS dep were observed for C-reactive protein levels (male; Stouffer’s p =2.40 ×10 −5 ) and triglyceride levels (female; Stouffer’s p =5.19 ×10 −3 ). Further differentiation was observed in the female subgroups based on post-menopausal status for WBC (Stouffer’s p =3.83 ×10 −3 ) and neutrophil/granulocyte (Stouffer’s p =5.05 ×10 −3 ) counts. Bi-directional mediation was also observed between all five biomarkers and a depression diagnosis, with up to 12.6% of the association between PRS dep and triglyceride levels mediated through depression. Conclusions We have shown that effects of PRS dep on multiple peripheral biomarkers, beyond WBC, remain significant even when accounting for important interactions of biological sex and age, providing insight into the pro-inflammatory etiology of depression.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.049

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuemedRxiv→Same topicTryptophan and brain disorders→French-language works237,207→