Venous thromboembolism in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease: an 11-year population-based nested case–control study in Canada
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To investigate the occurrence of venous thromboembolism (VTE), clinical characteristics, risk factors, treatment outcomes, and anticoagulation safety in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) over an 11-year period. A nested case-control study within an identified cohort was performed amongst children with IBD from 2009 to 2020 in Canada. There were 890 hospitalizations during the study period, and 15 venous thromboembolic events (1.69%) among 12 patients occurred, including 12 with ulcerative colitis and three with Crohn's disease. VTE proportions were significantly different between female (2.7%) and male (0.8%) patients (P = 0.03). VTE in the ulcerative colitis group (4.2%) was significantly higher than in the Crohn's disease group (0.6%) (P = 0.001). Central venous catheter and length of hospital stay were correlated to VTE development. Twelve of 15 (80%) with VTEs presented symptoms related to extremity thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Nine of the 15 (60%) had a deep vein thrombosis, and 2 (13.3%) developed a severe pulmonary embolism. Seven of 15 (47%) received anticoagulation therapy for 1-6 months. VTE-related symptoms and repeat imaging tests improved with no bleeding complication in those treated with anticoagulation therapy. No patients received long-term thromboprophylaxis after antithrombotic treatment was discontinued. The VTE proportion in pediatric IBD patients was relatively low. Children with VTE were disproportionately females with ulcerative colitis compared with children without VTE. Patients with VTE had a good prognosis after anticoagulation therapy without mortality or increased bleeding events. The role of VTE screening and efficacy of thromboprophylaxis need to be further evaluated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".