MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W4309657406 · doi:10.1503/cmaj.220645-f

Prophylaxie préexposition au VIH : efficace et sous-utilisée

2022· article· fr· W4309657406 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Amanda Hempel, Mia J. Biondi, Jean‐Guy Baril, Darrell H. S. Tan

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Medical Association Journal · 2022
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicHIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier de l’Université de MontréalUniversity of TorontoUniversité de MontréalToronto Liver CentreSt. Michael's Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)Exposition (narrative)HumanitiesMedicineGynecologyVirologyPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

[Voir la version anglaise de l’article ici : www.cmaj.ca/lookup/doi/10.1503/cmaj.220645][1] Points clés L’incidence du virus de l’immunodéficience humaine (VIH) est en hausse au Canada. L’Agence de la santé publique du Canada a estimé à 2242 le nombre de nouveaux cas de VIH déclarés

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Medical Association Journal→Same topicHIV, Drug Use, Sexual Risk→French-language works237,207→