MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4309664035 · doi:10.1177/20406223221137499

Strongyloidiasis: what every gastroenterologist needs to know

2022· review· en· W4309664035 on OpenAlexafffund
Sabrina Yeung, Yashvi Bharwada, Shveta Bhasker, Andrea K. Boggild

Bibliographic record

VenueTherapeutic Advances in Chronic Disease · 2022
Typereview
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicParasites and Host Interactions
Canadian institutionsToronto General HospitalUniversity of ManitobaPublic Health OntarioUniversity of TorontoMcMaster University
FundersUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
KeywordsStrongyloidiasisStrongyloides stercoralisMedicineAsymptomaticDiseaseParasitic diseaseImmunologyIntensive care medicineGastroenterologyInternal medicineHelminths

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

, which has the potential for fatal outcome. It may present with vague gastrointestinal symptoms and mimic gastrointestinal diseases such as inflammatory bowel disease, and as such, it should be in the purview of the gastroenterologist. While strongyloidiasis is generally asymptomatic or produces mild symptoms in patients with an intact immune system, individuals who are immunocompromised may develop life-threatening disease through hyperinfection syndrome and disseminated disease. The worm has a complex lifecycle and is able to autoinfect its host, thereby allowing indefinite persistence even decades after initial infection. This leads to cases where travelers, and those who lived in endemic countries, may present years after travel. With its features of prolonged infection, relatively high global prevalence, and potential for fatal outcomes, it is imperative for all clinicians to be aware of this disease. Owing to its involvement with the gastrointestinal system, however, we will outline salient points about strongyloidiasis for the gastroenterologist.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.997
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.384
Teacher spread0.341 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTherapeutic Advances in Chronic DiseaseSame topicParasites and Host InteractionsFrench-language works237,207