MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4309672248 · doi:10.3138/cjfs-2022-0024

Crawley Films and Canada’s Audiovisual Infrastructure for Resource Extraction

2022· article· fr· W4309672248 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Charles R. Acland

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Film Studies · 2022
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArtEthnologyHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La compagnie Crawley Films, située à Ottawa, a été le principal producteur privé de films industriels et éducatifs au Canada entre 1939 et 1982. Alors que l’historiographie s’est penchée sur les œuvres éducatives et sur les incursions dans le domaine du long métrage de la compagnie, cet essai examine ses films commandités portant sur l’extraction des ressources naturelles. Pendant des décennies, Crawley Films a fourni aux réseaux audiovisuels du Canada et d’ailleurs un vaste catalogue qui faisait valoir les priorités nationales et celles des entreprises en matière d’utilisation des terres, de procédés industriels d’extraction et de colonisation. En se penchant sur l’industrie de l’aluminium et sur le film Generator 4 (1956), réalisé par Crawley Films pour Alcan, cet essai montre comment de telles productions, en films 16mm et 35mm, ont été reformatées selon les médias et les usages dans le cadre d’une infrastructure médiatique canadienne qui dépendait de l’infrastructure industrielle et en faisait la promotion.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.987
Threshold uncertainty score0.335

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0130.007
Scholarly communication0.0080.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0190.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2022
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Film StudiesSame topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207