MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4309676964 · doi:10.53350/pjmhs22169792

Importance of Lumbar Puncture in Late Onset Sepsis

2022· article· en· W4309676964 on OpenAlexaff
Mariam Riaz, Sher Alam Khan, Alia Halim, Faisal Javed, Allah Nawaz Sultan

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeonatal and Maternal Infections
Canadian institutionsAbbott (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSepsisMedicineLumbar punctureBlood cultureMeningitisLethargyNeonatal sepsisNeonatal intensive care unitPediatricsCerebrospinal fluidInternal medicineAntibiotics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Neonatal sepsis is the significant reason of neonatal mortality and morbidity and mostly results in extended hospitalization of infants in the neonatal intensive care unit. The sepsis was confirmed by a positive blood culture and a condition is considered clinical sepsis when the blood culture is negative. It is practically not possible to clinically differentiate sepsis from neonatal meningitis. However, a positive CSF for pathogenic bacteria indicates meningitis. Aim: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the frequency of late-onset sepsis in neonates with meningitis and to determine whether CSF analysis and lumbar puncture is mandatory in all cases of late-onset sepsis. Methods: This study was conducted in the Paediatrics department of CMH Abbottabad, and Sharif Medical City Hospital Lahore, and Pathology department of Women Medical and Dental College, Abbottabad for the duration from January 2022 to June 2022 among neonates with late neonatal sepsis. All neonates underwent clinical examination, history, routine tests (blood culture, C-reactive protein, complete blood count) and analysis and culture of cerebrospinal fluid for clinical evaluation of sepsis. Results: All 80 neonates tested positive for clinical sepsis: hematological sepsis was seen in 59 patients and 21 were CSF culture positive for sepsis; 8 (38.9%) of the 21 have positive CSF culture and 13 cases have negative blood culture. The most common clinical symptom was poor suction 70(87.5%), followed by weak moor 61(76.3%), and lethargy 46(57.5%). The Klebsiella spp was common organism seen in 15 children in the blood culture and the most communal organism in the cerebrospinal fluid culture was Staphylococcus aureus in 6 cases. Conclusions: The incidence of neonatal meningitis is high in new-borns with late-onset sepsis. Meningitis in neonates often transpires in the absence of bacteraemia. Therefore, the CSF examination and lumbar puncture are compulsory in all children with late onset sepsis. Keywords: Lumbar puncture, Meningitis, Neonatal sepsis

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNeonatal and Maternal InfectionsFrench-language works237,207