Minimizing operating expenditures for a manufacturing system featuring quality reassurances, probabilistic failures, overtime, and outsourcing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Production management operating in recent competitive marketplaces must satisfy the client desired quality and shorter order lead-time and avoid internal fabricating disruption caused by inevitable defects and stochastic equipment failures. Achieving these operational tasks without undesirable quality goods, missing due dates, and fabrication interruption help the management minimize operating expenditures. Motivated by assisting manufacturing firms in the situations mentioned this study explores a manufacturing system that features quality reassurances through reworking or removal of defectives, correction of probabilistic failures, and partial overtime and outsourcing options for reducing uptime. This study finds the function of system operating expenditures through model building, mathematical formulations, optimization approaches, and algorithm proposition, shows its convexity, and derives the optimal batch time for the studied manufacturing model. Finally, this study offers numerical illustrations to confirm our work’s applicability and disclose its capability to provide various profound crucial system information that helps the management make strategic operating decisions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".