Metaheuristic algorithm for the location, routing and packing problem in the collection of recyclable waste
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The increasing accumulation of solid waste worldwide has made it necessary to look for alternatives that improve the operation of recyclable waste collection systems to make waste treatment more profitable and eco-friendlier. This paper introduces a new variant of the multi-compartment vehicle routing problem (MCVRP) that considers the rearrangement or relocation of collection points and packing the demand. This problem is called the location packing multi-compartment vehicle routing problem (LPMCVRP) and is developed for a waste collection system using vehicles with flexible compartments. A mathematical formulation of the problem is proposed. A two-phase metaheuristic algorithm based on a tabu search without packing considerations and a variant that integrates a tabu search and a greedy randomized adaptive search procedure (GRASP) scheme with packing constraints have been proposed. A set of instances adapted from the literature is generated to validate the proposed solution strategy. The results obtained show the efficiency of the proposed solution scheme for optimizing collection systems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it