A matheuristic based solution approach for the general lot sizing and scheduling problem with sequence dependent changeovers and back ordering
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper considers the general lot sizing and scheduling problem (GLSP) in single level capacitated environments with sequence dependent item changeovers. The proposed model simultaneously determines the production sequence of multiple items with capacity-constrained dynamic demand and lot size to minimize overall costs. First, a mixed-integer programming (MIP) model for the GLSP is developed in order to solve smaller size problems. Afterwards, a matheuristic algorithm that integrates Simulated Annealing (SA) algorithm and the proposed MIP model is devised for solving larger size problems. The proposed matheuristic approach decomposes the GLSP into sub-problems. The proposed SA algorithm plays the controller role. It guides the search process by determining values for some of the decision variables and calls the MIP model to identify the optimal values for the remaining decision variables at each iteration. Extensive numerical experiments on randomly generated test instances are performed in order to evaluate the performance of the proposed matheuristic method. It is observed that the proposed matheuristic based solution method outperforms the MIP and SA, if they are used alone for solving the present GLSP.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".