MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4309717775 · doi:10.1061/ijgnai.gmeng-7898

Undrained Stability of Opening in Underground Walls in Anisotropic Clays

2022· article· en· W4309717775 on OpenAlexaff
Van Qui Lai, Reza Jamshidi Chenari, Rungkhun Banyong, Suraparb Keawsawasvong

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Geomechanics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Analysis
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAnisotropyOverburdenGeotechnical engineeringStability (learning theory)Factor of safetyLimit analysisGeologyFinite element methodPlane stressShear strength (soil)Materials scienceStructural engineeringEngineeringSoil waterPhysicsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A two-dimensional (2D) finite-element limit analysis (FELA) was performed under plane strain conditions to investigate the undrained stability of tunnel launch with a rigid wall in anisotropic clays. The anisotropic undrained shear (AUS) failure criteria were applied to identify anisotropic soil behaviors. The average bound solutions were employed to compute the stability load factor. Different sensitivity analyses were carried out to determine the effect of cover–depth ratio (C/D), overburden factor (γD/suTC), and anisotropic strength ratio (re) on the load factor (N) of the opening in tunnel launching with a rigid wall. The failure patterns that were predicted by certain parameters were explored and investigated. To adopt a practical approach, some new design charts for the undrained stability of tunnel launching with a rigid wall in anisotropic clays were devised.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.083
Threshold uncertainty score0.347

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of GeomechanicsSame topicGeotechnical Engineering and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207