Impact of Transient Infiltration on the Ultimate Bearing Capacity of Obliquely and Eccentrically Loaded Strip Footings on Partially Saturated Soils
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Soils above the groundwater table and near the ground surface are often partially saturated, and the changes in the degree of saturation and matric suction caused by infiltration may have substantial effects on the stability of geotechnical systems. This work evaluates the significant effect of transient flow on the ultimate bearing capacity of strip footings founded on unsaturated soils under the simultaneous actions of vertical and horizontal loads and moment using the lower-bound theorems of the finite-element limit analysis and the incorporation of second-order cone programming. The unified effective stress theory is incorporated into the soil yield function to model the partially saturated state, and the closed-form solution for one-dimensional transient flow is adopted so as to evaluate the tempo-spatial variations of suction stress. For both sand and clay underlying soils, it is found that the increase of infiltration time leads to a notable decrease of the size of the normalized failure envelopes for either obliquely or eccentrically loaded shallow foundations. The impact of transient flow on the ultimate bearing capacity of surface footings is also observed to be greater for clay soils as compared with sand deposits due to the significant contribution of higher induced suction stress.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".