Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article remonte au 19 e siècle pour mieux comprendre pourquoi et comment les dirigeants américains ont fini par accorder une importance stratégique exceptionnelle à l’Indochine après la Seconde guerre mondiale. Cet essai avance l’idée selon laquelle on ne peut pas comprendre l’engagement américain en Indochine après 1945 sans le resituer dans son contexte géopolitique et impérial vu du Pacifique. Pour le meilleur ou le pire, les Américains ont fait de l’Indochine un maillon essentiel dans une chaîne défensive visant à protéger les intérêts américains non seulement en Asie du Sud-Est mais aussi dans l’océan Pacifique, ce « lac américain » cachant un empire maritime datant du 19 e siècle. La fixation américaine sur l’Indochine amènera Washington à intervenir indirectement en Indochine en soutenant les Français contre Ho Chi Minh avant de faire leur propre guerre au Vietnam dans les années 1960.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".