A Generic Preprocessing Architecture for Multi-Modal IoT Sensor Data in Artificial General Intelligence
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A main barrier for autonomous and general learning systems is their inability to understand and adapt to new environments—that is, to apply previously learned abstract solutions to new problems. Supervised learning system functions such as classification require data labeling from an external source and do not have the ability to learn feature representation autonomously. This research details an unsupervised learning method for multi-modal feature detection and evaluation to be used for preprocessing in general learning systems. The learning method details a clustering algorithm that can be applied to any generic IoT sensor data, and a seeded stimulus labeling algorithm impacted and evolved by cross-modal input. The method is implemented and tested in two agents consuming audio and image data, each with varying innate stimulus criteria. Their run-time stimulus changes over time depending on their experiences, while newly experienced features become meaningful without preprogrammed labeling of distinct attributes. The architecture provides interfaces for higher-order cognitive processes to be built on top of the unsupervised preprocessor. This method is unsupervised and modular, in contrast to the highly constrained and pretrained learning systems that exist, making it extendable and well-disposed for use in artificial general intelligence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".