Neuro-Fuzzy Adaptive Direct Torque and Flux Control of a Grid Connected DFIG-WECS with Improved Dynamic Performance
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents an adaptive neuro-fuzzy interface system (ANFIS) based direct torque and flux control (DTFC) scheme for grid connected doubly fed induction generator (DFIG) based wind energy conversion system (WECS). The proposed ANFIS based DTFC compares the actual developed torque and stator flux with their respective references and generate required PWM logic signals for the Rotor Side Converter (RSC) that enhance the dynamic performance of the DFIG based WECS. The ANFIS is utilized in this work due to its capability of handling nonlinear system accurately, fast convergence and incorporating the advantages of both the neural network as well as the fuzzy system. A hybrid training algorithm is developed to adapt the membership functions of the ANFIS structure to handle the WECS nonlinearities and wind speed uncertainties. The training data for the ANFIS is obtained from the conventional PI controller based DFIG system running at different operating conditions. The stability analysis of the proposed ANFIS based WECS is performed by approximating the system to a standard second order system which confirms the stability of the proposed WECS. The proposed scheme is simulated using MATLAB-Simulink software. The performance of the proposed ANFIS based adaptive DTFC scheme for DFIG-WECS is found superior to both the traditional fuzzy logic and PI controllers in terms of robust control over electromechanical torque and stator current at various wind speed conditions. The real-time implementation of the proposed control scheme for a laboratory prototype DFIG-WECS is currently underway.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".