MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4309772930 · doi:10.1016/j.rineng.2022.100785

Adaptive SVSF-KF estimation strategies based on the normalized innovation square metric and IMM strategy

2022· article· en· W4309772930 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueResults in Engineering · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFault Detection and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRobustness (evolution)Kalman filterControl theory (sociology)Metric (unit)Computer scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The smooth variable structure filter (SVSF) is highly robust to modeling uncertainty and unknown disturbances. Recent developments to the SVSF have allowed for the creation of an adaptive estimation scheme termed the SVSF-KF, which balances the optimality of the Kalman filter (KF) with the robustness of the SVSF. The approach utilizes the KF estimate during normal operation, and utilizes the robust SVSF gain to estimate the states during the presence of a fault. However, the gain adaptation involved in detecting a fault and switching between the KF and SVSF estimates suffers from several limitations, including unwanted chattering. In this work, we review the original SVSF-KF approach and present two novel SVSF-KF strategies based on the normalized innovation square metric and the interacting multiple model strategy to address these limitations. Experimental simulations involving a simple harmonic oscillator subject to a fault condition are conducted, which verify the effectiveness of our proposed approaches.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.260
Threshold uncertainty score0.523

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.216
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it