MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4309784167 · doi:10.6000/1929-7092.2022.11.04

Modeling SMEs Credit Default Risk: The Case of Saudi Arabia

2022· article· en· W4309784167 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Tahar Tayachi, Ahmed BenSaïda

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Reviews on Global Economics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicFinancial Distress and Bankruptcy Prediction
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBusinessCredit riskLogistic regressionDefault riskTransparency (behavior)Small and medium-sized enterprisesConstruct (python library)FinanceFinancial systemComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study assesses the credit risk of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to minimize unexpected risk events. We construct a hybrid statistical model based on factor analysis and logistic regression to predict enterprise default on loans and determine the factors predicting SMEs default. We assess the credit risk of SMEs listed on the Saudi stock market. The results indicate that the SMEs acid-test ratios are the most influential factors in predicting SMEs credit risk. Therefore, the designed logistic model can be used by financial institutions during the decision-making process of granting loans to SMEs. This study sheds light on challenging access to bank credits due to the lack of financial transparency of most Saudi SMEs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.643
Threshold uncertainty score0.349

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Reviews on Global EconomicsSame topicFinancial Distress and Bankruptcy PredictionFrench-language works237,207