An Economical and Scalable Method to Synthesize Graphitic-Like Films
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An economical and facile method to synthesize a precursor for carbon films and materials has been developed. This precursor can be easily coated onto substrates without binder reagents and then converted into a graphitic-like structure after mild thermal treatment. This approach potentially allows the coating of glass surfaces of different shapes and forms, such as the inside of a glass tube, for instance. The precursor consists of tetrahedral halocarbyne units which randomly combine through single electron transfer with organometallic compounds to create a poly(carbyne)-like polymeric material. Advanced characterization tools reveal that the synthesized product (poly(halocarbyne) or PXC, where X indicate the presence of halogens, is composed mostly of carbon, hydrogen, and a variable percentage of residual halocarbon groups. Therefore, it possesses good solubility in organic solvents and can be coated on any complex substrate. The coated PXC material produced here was annealed under mild conditions, leading to the production of a graphitic-like film on a glass substrate. The chemical homogeneity of the carbon material of the film was confirmed by Raman spectroscopy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".