MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4309822002 · doi:10.1016/j.tmaid.2022.102509

Zero by 2030 and OneHealth: The multidisciplinary challenges of rabies control and elimination

2022· editorial· en· W4309822002 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
D. Katterine Bonilla‐Aldana, Julián Ruíz-Saenz, Marlén Martínez‐Gutierrez, Wilmer E. Villamil‐Gómez, Hugo Mantilla-Meluk, Germán Arrieta, Darwin A. León‐Figueroa, Vicente A. Benítes-Zapata, Águeda Muñoz del Carpio Toia, Oscar H. Franco, Maritza Cabrera, Ranjit Sah, Jaffar A. Al‐Tawfiq, Ziad A. Memish, Fatma Amer, José Antonio Suárez, Andrés F. Henao‐Martínez, Carlos Franco‐Paredes, Alimuddin Zumla, Alfonso J. Rodríguez‐Morales

Bibliographic record

VenueTravel Medicine and Infectious Disease · 2022
Typeeditorial
Languageen
FieldImmunology and Microbiology
TopicRabies epidemiology and control
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRabiesMultidisciplinary approachZero (linguistics)VirologyMedicineEnvironmental healthPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

"Rabies, caused by a negative strand RNA-virus belonging to the
\ngenus Lyssavirus (family Rhabdoviridae of the order Mononegavirales),
\nremains of global concern [1]. This vaccine-preventable viral zoonotic
\ndisease is present in more than 150 countries and territories [2]. Ac-
\ncording to the World Health Organization (WHO), rabies is estimated to
\ncause ~59,000 human deaths annually, with 95% of cases occurring in
\nAfrica and Asia [3,4]. However, rabies still occurs in other regions, such
\nas Latin America and the Caribbean [5–8], Central Asia and the Middle
\nEast [9,10]. Whilst a number of animals can host the rabies virus, dogs
\nare the main source of human rabies deaths, contributing up to 99% of
\nall rabies transmissions to humans. Dog-mediated rabies has been
\neliminated from Western Europe, Canada, the United States of America
\n(USA), Japan and some Latin American countries [11]. Nevertheless, the
\nrisk of reintroduction and disease among travellers to risk areas is a
\nmatter of concern [12–15]. As occurred with many other communicable
\nand non-communicable diseases, the 2020–2022 COVID-19 pandemic
\nnegatively impacted the efforts of control and reemergence of rabies in
\ncertain countries [7,16,17]. Post-pandemic challenges to enhance con-
\ntrol and prevention are multiple and need urgent actions to achieve the
\ngoal in eight years by 2030 [16]."

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.832
Threshold uncertainty score0.919

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTravel Medicine and Infectious DiseaseSame topicRabies epidemiology and controlFrench-language works237,207