MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4309837901 · doi:10.1149/ma2022-023206mtgabs

Towards a Better Understanding of Redox Shuttle Generation in Lfp/Graphite and NMC811/Graphite Cells By Systematic Investigation of Different Electrolyte Additives

2022· article· en· W4309837901 on OpenAlexaffabout
Sebastian Büchele, Thomas Boulanger, E. R. Logan, Louis Hartmann, Ahmed Eldesoky, Saad Azam, Tina Taskovic, Michel B. Johnson, Michael Metzger

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Meeting Abstracts · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Technologies Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité de SherbrookeDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectrolyteEthylene carbonateGraphiteDimethyl carbonateFOIL methodMaterials scienceInorganic chemistryChemistryChemical engineeringElectrodeOrganic chemistryMethanolComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent observations by our group show the creation of a reversible shuttle species in LFP/graphite and NMC811/graphite cells with 3:7 ethylene carbonate:dimethyl carbonate (EC:DMC) based electrolytes. This is indicated by a high reversible self-discharge of these cells in the absence of electrolyte additives. Electrolyte extraction from pouch cells after formation allowed to directly investigate the electrolytes for redox shuttle currents. For this purpose, the extracted electrolytes were inserted into coin cells with an Al foil as the working electrode (WE) and a Li foil as the counter electrode (CE). The measured cyclic voltammetry (CV) of the coin cells show a clear relationship between high formation temperature and high shuttle currents. Interestingly, the addition of vinylene carbonate (VC) to the electrolyte completely prevents the shuttle current, even at elevated formation temperatures. [1] In this study, we systematically investigate the effect of various electrolyte additives on the generation of shuttle molecules. LFP/graphite and NMC811/graphite pouch cells were filled with electrolyte consisting of 3:7 EC:DMC with 1.5 M lithium hexafluorophosphate (LiPF6) and different additives. The pouch cells were formed at different temperatures, TF. The electrolytes were then extracted and inserted into the aforementioned coin cell setup for CV measurements. We have found that additives such as VC, fluoroethylene carbonate (FEC), ethylene sulfate (DTD), prop-1-ene-1,3-sultone (PES), and triallyl phosphate (TAP), which are known to create a stable solid electrolyte interphase (SEI), [2-4] prevent shuttle current in the CV. On the other hand, additives such as succinonitrile (SN) and trimethylsilyl isothiocyanate (TMSNCS), which do not contribute to the formation of a better SEI, [5,6] cannot prevent the shuttle current. This suggests that the formation of the shuttles is due to a poor SEI and therefore occurs at the interface between electrolyte and graphite anode. Analogue experiments with DMC as only solvent instead of 3:7 EC:DMC show similar shuttle currents in CVs, which suggests that linear carbonates such as DMC are required to form the shuttle. Figure 1 shows CVs for 1.5 M LiPF6 DMC electrolyte. The shuttle current appears to be the same for electrolyte extracted from LFP/graphite and NMC811/graphite cells ranging up to 6 μA in both cases. This indicates that the shuttle is formed independently of the cathode material, and therefore gives rise to the hypothesis that it is formed at the anode-electrolyte interface. Figure 1 also shows that the shuttle current increases with higher formation temperatures TF. References: Boulanger, A. Eldesoky. S. Buechele, T. Taskovic, S. Azam, C. Aiken, E. Logan, M. Metzger, Investigation of redox shuttle generation in LFP/graphite and NMC811/graphite cells, Submitted (2022). Song, J. Harlow, E. Logan, H. Hebecker, M. Coon, L. Molino, M. Johnson, J. Dahn, M. Metzger, A Systematic Study of Electrolyte Additives in Single Crystal and Bimodal LiNi 0.8 Mn 0.1 Co 0.1 O 2 /Graphite Pouch Cells , J. Electrochem. Soc. 168 (2021) 090503. doi:10.1149/1945-7111/ac1e55. J. Nelson, J. Xia, J.R. Dahn, Studies of the Effect of Varying Prop-1-ene-1,3-sultone Content in Lithium Ion Pouch Cells, J. Electrochem. Soc. 161 (2014) A1884–A1889. doi:10.1149/2.0791412jes. Xia, L. Madec, L. Ma, L.D. Ellis, W. Qiu, K.J. Nelson, Z. Lu, J.R. Dahn, Study of triallyl phosphate as an electrolyte additive for high voltage lithium-ion cells, J. Power Sources. 295 (2015) 203–211. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.06.151. Chen, F. Liu, Y. Chen, Y. Ye, Y. Huang, F. Wu, L. Li, An investigation of functionalized electrolyte using succinonitrile additive for high voltage lithium-ion batteries, J. Power Sources. 306 (2016) 70–77. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.10.105. G. Han, M.Y. Jeong, K. Kim, C. Park, C.H. Sung, D.W. Bak, K.H. Kim, K.M. Jeong, N.S. Choi, An electrolyte additive capable of scavenging HF and PF5 enables fast charging of lithium-ion batteries in LiPF6-based electrolytes, J. Power Sources. 446 (2020) 227366. doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2019.227366. Acknowledgements This work was funded under the auspices of the NSERC/Tesla Canada Alliance Grant program. Figure 1

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS Meeting AbstractsSame topicAdvanced Battery Technologies ResearchFrench-language works237,207