Quantifying deep neural network uncertainty for atrial fibrillation detection with limited labels
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia found in the intensive care unit (ICU), and is associated with many adverse outcomes. Effective handling of AF and similar arrhythmias is a vital part of modern critical care, but obtaining knowledge about both disease burden and effective interventions often requires costly clinical trials. A wealth of continuous, high frequency physiological data such as the waveforms derived from electrocardiogram telemetry are promising sources for enriching clinical research. Automated detection using machine learning and in particular deep learning has been explored as a solution for processing these data. However, a lack of labels, increased presence of noise, and inability to assess the quality and trustworthiness of many machine learning model predictions pose challenges to interpretation. In this work, we propose an approach for training deep AF models on limited, noisy data and report uncertainty in their predictions. Using techniques from the fields of weakly supervised learning, we leverage a surrogate model trained on non-ICU data to create imperfect labels for a large ICU telemetry dataset. We combine these weak labels with techniques to estimate model uncertainty without the need for extensive human data annotation. AF detection models trained using this process demonstrated higher classification performance (0.64-0.67 F1 score) and improved calibration (0.05-0.07 expected calibration error).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.007 | 0.038 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".