Computational design and fabrication of active 3D-printed multi-state structures for shape morphing
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Active structures can change their shape, properties, and functionality as a response to changing operational conditions, which makes them more versatile than their static counterparts. However, most active structures currently lack the capability to achieve multiple, different target states with a single input actuation or require a tedious material programming step. In this work, a computational design and fabrication framework is proposed to generate structures with multiple target states for one input actuation that do not require a separate training step. A material dithering scheme based on multi-material 3D printing is combined with locally applied copper coil heating elements and sequential heating patterns to control the thermo-mechanical properties of the structures and switch between the different deformation modes. A novel topology optimization approach based on power diagrams is used to encode different target states in the structure while ensuring the fabricability of the structures. The numerical and experimental results show that the optimization framework can produce structures that show the desired motion, but experimental accuracy is limited by current fabrication methods. The generality of the proposed method makes it suitable for the development of structures for applications in many different fields from aerospace to robotics to animated fabrication in computer graphics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".