MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4309928785 · doi:10.1002/mp.16101

Xenon‐enhanced dual‐energy tomosynthesis for functional imaging of respiratory disease—Concept and phantom study

2022· article· en· W4309928785 on OpenAlexafffund
Jesse Tanguay, Fateen Basharat

Bibliographic record

VenueMedical Physics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAtomic and Subatomic Physics Research
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanada Foundation for Innovation
KeywordsImaging phantomTomosynthesisMaterials scienceNuclear medicineBiomedical engineeringXenonMedical imagingMedicinePhysicsRadiologyMammography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Background Xenon‐enhanced dual‐energy (DE) computed tomography (CT) and hyperpolarized noble‐gas magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provide maps of lung ventilation that can be used to detect chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) early in its development and predict respiratory exacerbations. However, xenon‐enhanced DE‐CT requires high radiation doses and hyper‐polarized noble‐gas MRI is expensive and only available at a handful of institutions globally. Purpose To present xenon‐enhanced dual‐energy tomosynthesis (XeDET) for low‐dose, low‐cost functional imaging of respiratory disease in an experimental phantom study. Methods We propose using digital tomosynthesis to produce Xe‐enhanced low‐energy (LE) and high‐energy (HE) coronal images. DE subtraction of the LE and HE images is used to suppress soft tissues. We used an imaging phantom to investigate image quality in terms of the area under the reciever operating characteristic curve (AUC) for the Non‐PreWhitening model observer with an Eye filter and internal noise (NPWEi). The phantom simulated anatomic clutter due to lung parenchyma and attenuation due to soft tissue and lung tissue. Aluminum slats were used to simulate rib structures. A stepwedge consisting of an acrylic casing with sealed cylindrical air‐filled cavities was used to simulate ventilation defects with step thicknesses of 0.5, 1, and 2 cm and cylindrical radii of 0.5, 0.75, and 1 cm. The phantom was ventilated with Xe and projection data were acquired using a flat‐panel detector, a tube‐voltage combination of 60/140 kV with 1.2 mm of copper filtration on the HE spectrum and an angular range of in 1° increments. The AUC of a NPWEi observer that has access only to a single coronal slice was calculated from measurements of the three‐dimensional noise power spectrum and signal template. The AUC was calculated as a function of ventilation defect thickness and radius for total patient entrance air kermas ranging from 1.42 to 2.84 mGy with and without rib‐simulating Al slats. For the AUC analysis, the observer internal noise level was obtained from an ad hoc calibration to a high‐dose data set. Results XeDET was able to suppress parenchyma‐simulating clutter in coronal images enabling visualization of the simulated ventilation defects, but the limited angle acquisition resulted in residual clutter due to out‐of‐plane bone‐mimmicking structures. The signal power of the defects increased linearly with defect radius and showed a ten‐fold to fifteen‐fold increase in signal power when the defect thickness increased from 0.5 to 2 cm. These trends agreed with theoretical predictions. Along the depth dimension, the power of the defects decreased exponentially with distance from the center of the defects with full‐width half maxima that varied from 1.85 to 2.85 cm depending on the defect thickness and radius. The AUCs of the 1‐cm‐radius defect that was 2 cm in thickness ranged from good (0.8–0.9) to excellent (0.9–1.0) over the range of air kermas considered. Conclusions Xenon‐enhanced DE tomosynthesis has the potential to enable functional imaging of respiratory disease and should be further investigated as a low‐cost alternative to MRI‐based approaches and a low‐dose alternative to CT‐based approaches.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedical PhysicsSame topicAtomic and Subatomic Physics ResearchFrench-language works237,207