Ecological risks of some heavy metals in sediment samples collected from downstream of the Red river
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This study aimed to assess the accumulation of some heavy metals such as Cu, Pb, Cd, and Cr in the sediments collected from downstream of the Red river from the south of Hanoi city to Nam Truc district, Nam Dinh province. Besides, the geological accumulation index (Igeo) and the potential ecological risk index were calculated to understand the impact of heavy metal content in the sediments on the ecosystem. The results showed that the concentration of several metals (Cu, Pb, Cd, Cr) in 20 sediment samples was lower than the permitted values specified in Technical Regulations on sediment quality (QCVN 43:2017/BTNMT). However, according to the Canadian guidelines, the concentrations of metals in 50% of samples had a low level of effect. The potential ecological risk index of metals ranges from 1.8 to 11.6, revealing that the study area has a low-level metal risk. This data can clarify the area’s potential risk level and provide the scientific basis for recommending measures to control and reduce sources of metal pollution into the aquatic environment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".