Operation analysis of a three-phase induction motor with deep rotor bars and variable parameters
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The paper presents a mathematical model of the three-phase induction motor (IM), whose rotor construction involves the presence of a squirrel cage executed with deep bars (DB). The model, detailed in dynamic and steady-state forms, covers the operation of the induction motor, energized from a constant frequency supply. Besides the steady state regimes, the model covers the analysis of transient regimes, such as starting across the line with or without reduced voltage starters and changes in load torque. The dependency on the frequency of the rotor parameters is still a vivid subject for researchers, leading to the development of multiple models validated by experiments over the years. The derivation of the model from this paper starts from a well-known space phasor model, modified by introducing the rotor parameters referred to the stator $R^{\prime}2(\omega_{r}),L^{\prime}2\sigma(\omega_{2})$, as functions of the rotor frequency f <inf xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">r</inf> , and consequently of slip, because of the skin effect and local saturation of the rotor slot’s neck. Following such an assumption validated by the literature, one developed slip-dependent analytical expressions of the rotor parameters referred to as the stator. The modified model became the subject of simulations whose outcome is assessing the steady state and transient characteristics of an induction motor. The obtained results verify the conclusions from multiple bibliographical resources.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".