MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4310004435 · doi:10.3658/foo.bar

Watch!! Morocco vs Belgium FREE Live Online Coverage FIFA World Cup Broadcast At TV Channel 27th November 2022

2022· article· en· W4310004435 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Morocco vs Belgium FREE Live

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicE-commerce and Technology Innovations
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChannel (broadcasting)TelecommunicationsAdvertisingComputer scienceBusiness

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Belgium vs Morocco live stream: How can I watch World Cup 2022 game for FREE on TV UK today? Belgium vs Morocco is scheduled to kick off at 1pm GMT on Sunday 27 November. Belgium vs. Morocco FREE LIVE STREAM (11/27/22): Watch World Cup 2022 online\n\n \n\n\n\t🔴✅WATCH FIFA 2022 World Cup LIVE\n\n\n \n\nBelgium vs Morocco: Date & kick-off time\n\n\n\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\tGame:\n\t\t\tBelgium vs Morocco\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\tDate:\n\t\t\tNovember 27, 2022\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\tKick-off:\n\t\t\t1:00 pm GMT / 8:00 am ET/ 3:00 CAT / 6:30 pm IST\n\t\t\n\t\t\n\t\t\tVenue:\n\t\t\tAl Thumama Stadium, Qatar\n\t\t\n\t\n\n\n \n\nBelgium will hope to continue their winning run when they play Morocco in the FIFA World Cup at the Al Thumama Stadium on Friday.\n\nRoberto Martinez’s men picked up a hard-fought win against Canada in their tournament opener despite being far from their best. An early penalty save by Thibaut Courtois and Michy Batshuayi’s 44th-minute goal sealed the three points. Kevin De Bruyne and co. will likely need to shift up the gears against Morocco to secure their place in the knockouts.\n\n \n\nNot since 2006 have the Socceroos made the knockout stage while Belgium have never played a last-16 game at the World Cup, and with a ferocious backing in Qatar they will be under pressure to grab a vital win today.\n\nΤhe CORD-19 dataset released by the team of Semantic Scholar1 anddg\nΤhe curated data provided by the LitCovid hub2.gd\n\nThese data have been cleaned and integrated with data from COVID-19-TweetIDs and from other sources (e.g., PMC). The result was dataset of 500,314 unique articles along with relevant metadata (e.g., the underlying citation network). We utilized this dataset to produce, for each article, the values of the following impact measures:\n\nInfluence: Citation-based measure reflecting the total impact of an article. This is based on the PageRank3 network analysis method. In the context of citation networks, it estimates the importance of each article based on its centrality in the whole network. This measure was calculated using the PaperRanking (https://github.com/diwis/zdhPaperRanking) library4.\n\nThese data have been cleaned and integrated with data from COVID-19-TweetIDs and from other sources (e.g., PMC). The result was dataset of 500,314 unique articles along with relevant metadata (e.g., the underlying citation network). We utilized this dataset to produce, for each article, the values of the following impact measures:sdgfdh\n\nInfluence: Citation-based measure reflecting the total impact of an article. This is based on the PageRank3 network analysis method. In the context of citation networks, it estimates the importance of each article based on its centrality in the whole network. This measure was calculated using the PaperRanking (https://github.com/diwifss/PaperRanking) library4.sdgd\nInfluence_alt: Citation-based measure reflecting the total impact of an article. This is the Citation Count of each article, calculated based on the citation network between the articles contained in the BIP4COVID19 dataset.sdgf\n\nsafs Popularity: Citation-based measure reflecting the current impact of an article. This is based on the AttRank5 citation network analysis method. Methods like PageRank are biased against recently published articles (new articles need time to receive their first citations). AttRank alleviates this problem incorporating an attention-based mechanism, akin to a time-restricted version of preferential attachment, to explicitly capture a researcher's preference to read papers which received a lot of attention recently. This is why it is more suitable to capture the current "hype" of an article.asdsg\n\nsf Popularity alternative: An alternative citation-based measure reflecting the current impact of an article (this was the basic popularity measured provided by BIP4COVID19 until version 26). This is based on the RAM6 citation network analysis method. Methods like PageRank are biased against recently published articles (new articles need time to receive their first citations). RAM alleviates this problem using an approach known as "time-awareness". This is why it is more suitable to capture the current "hype" of an article. This measure was calculated using the PaperRanking (https://github.com/diwis/PaperRanking) library4.sfb\nSocial Media Attention: The number of tweets related to this article. Relevant data were collected from the COVID-19-TweetIDs dataset. In this version, tweets between 23/6/22-29/6/22 have been considered from the previous dataset.\n\nWe provide five CSV files, all containing the same information, however each having its entries ordered by a different impact measure. All CSV files are tab separated and have the same columns (PubMed_id, PMC_id, DOI, influence_score, popularity_alt_score, popularity score, influence_alt score, tweets count).fyujyghdgbdfx\n\ndfgdfg

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Open science, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.382
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0050.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.008
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0830.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicE-commerce and Technology InnovationsFrench-language works237,207