MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4310009628 · doi:10.1080/24692921.2022.2144176

Aesthetic dance as woman’s culture in America at the turn of the twentieth century: Genevieve Stebbins and the New York school of expression

2022· article· en· W4310009628 on OpenAlex
Kelly Jean Lynch

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueFeminist Modernist Studies · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicDiversity and Impact of Dance
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDanceExpression (computer science)ArtArt historyGender studiesLiteratureAestheticsVisual artsHistorySociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This essay provides a historical overview of “new” aesthetic dance practices in the United States between 1890 and 1920 before the advent of modern dance. At the turn of the twentieth century women were the main practitioners of the developing aesthetic dance genres known alternatively as gymnastic, expressive, natural, interpretive, or classic dancing. Aesthetic dance practices were informed by aesthetic theories of expression. One of the most prominent educational aesthetic methods amongst women was the Delsarte System of Expression. The leading advocate, educator, and innovator contributing to the development of this system was Genevieve Stebbins. This essay concludes with an exploration of her pedagogy as taught at the New York School of Expression and her performances in theaters and women’s clubs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.200
Threshold uncertainty score0.590

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it