MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4310009888 · doi:10.1101/2022.11.23.517768

Gamma-Protocadherins regulate filopodia self-recognition and dynamics to drive dendrite self-avoidance

2022· preprint· en· W4310009888 on OpenAlexafffund
Samantha Ing-Esteves, Julie L. Lefebvre

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2022
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCellular Mechanics and Interactions
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsFilopodiaDendrite (mathematics)Dendritic filopodiaMorphogenesisBiologyNeuroscienceCell biologyActinDendritic spineGeneticsGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SUMMARY Neurons form cell type-specific morphologies that are shaped by molecular cues and their cellular events governing dendrite growth. One growth rule is distributing dendrites uniformly within a neuron’s territory by avoiding sibling or ‘self’ branches. In mammalian neurons, dendrite self-avoidance is regulated by the clustered Protocadherins (cPcdhs), a large family of recognition molecules. Genetic and molecular studies suggest that the cPcdhs mediate homophilic recognition and repulsion between self-dendrites but this model has not been tested through direct investigation of self-avoidance during development. Here we performed live imaging and 4D quantifications of dendrite morphogenesis to define the cPcdh-dependent mechanisms of self-avoidance. We focused on the mouse retinal starburst amacrine cell (SAC), which requires the gamma-Pcdhs ( Pcdhgs ) and self/non-self recognition to establish a stereotypic radial morphology while permitting dendritic interactions with neighboring SACs. Through morphogenesis, SACs extend a transient population of dynamic filopodia that fill the growing arbor and contact nearby self-dendrites. Compared to non-self-contacting filopodia, self-contacting events have longer lifetimes and a subset persists as filopodia bridges. In the absence of the Pcdhgs , non-self-contacting filopodia dynamics are unaffected but self-contact-induced retractions are significantly diminished. Filopodia bridges accumulate, leading to the bundling of dendritic processes and disruption to the arbor shape. By tracking dendrite self-avoidance in real-time, our findings demonstrate that the γ-Pcdhs selectively mediate contact-induced retractions upon filopodia self-recognition. Our results also illustrate how self-avoidance shapes the stochastic and space-filling behaviors of filopodia for robust dendritic pattern formation in mammalian neurons. HIGHLIGHTS Dendrite self-avoidance proceeds through interstitial filopodia and contact-induced retractions between sibling processes. Self-contacting filopodia exhibit longer lifetimes and a subset of contacts persist. Pcdhgs selectively regulate self-contact-induced retractions. Loss of Pcdhgs and filopodia self-avoidance disrupts dendritic arbor shape.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)Same topicCellular Mechanics and InteractionsFrench-language works237,207