MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W4310034831 · doi:10.3390/electronics11233920

PEASE: A PUF-Based Efficient Authentication and Session Establishment Protocol for Machine-to-Machine Communication in Industrial IoT

2022· article· en· W4310034831 on OpenAlexaff
Xiang Gong, Tao Feng, Maher Albettar

Bibliographic record

VenueElectronics · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicPhysical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) and Hardware Security
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceAuthentication (law)Authentication protocolScalabilityElliptic curve cryptographyServerOverhead (engineering)Computer networkMachine to machineEmbedded systemComputer securityInternet of ThingsEncryptionPublic-key cryptographyOperating system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Machine-to-machine (M2M) communication is one of the critical technologies of the industrial Internet of Things (IoT), which consists of sensors, actuators at the edge, and servers. In order to solve the security and availability problems regarding communication between edge devices with constrained resources and servers in M2M communication, in this study we proposed an authentication and session establishment protocol based on physical unclonable functions (PUFs). The scheme does not require clock synchronization among the devices, and it circumvents the situation where the authentication phase has to use a high computational overhead fuzzy extractor due to PUF noise. The protocol contains two message interactions, which provide strong security and availability while being lightweight. The security modelling is based on CPN Tools, which verifies security attributes and attack resistance in the authentication phase. After considering the design of the fuzzy extractor and scalability, the proposed scheme significantly reduces the computational overhead by more than 93.83% in the authentication phase compared with other schemes using PUFs. Meanwhile, under the guarantee of availability, the communication overhead is maintained at a balanced and reasonable level, at least 19.67% lower than the solution using XOR, hashing, or an elliptic curve.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.265 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueElectronicsSame topicPhysical Unclonable Functions (PUFs) and Hardware SecurityFrench-language works237,207